Live Knowledgebase > SmartBench > How to process different materials > Material processing datasheets > How to cut Oak Blockboard with SmartBench

Please Wait a Moment
X

Knowledge Base

Our knowledgebase contains all the information you need to know about all things SmartBench

 

How to cut Oak Blockboard with SmartBench

This article shows you how to cut this material on SmartBench. It also gives you a list of recommended cutters, a performance matrix to help you choose the right tool for your needs, and defines cutting strategies.

 | List | Next >

Overview

This article will take you through how we process this stock material with SmartBench. It will guide you through:

  • Material notes

  • Cutter selection

  • Strategy definition (i.e. the settings chosen when creating a toolpath within your CAM software).

Understanding these areas is critical to achieving high quality and cycle time of your job.

Material notes

Material description

This article does not cover live oak i.e. unprocessed single-piece oak slab (whilst this may serve as a good starting point, the grain in a monolithic slab will vary greatly, and so cutting strategy will differ significantly).

 

Links to the exact material used in Yeti Tool’s testing:

At Yeti Tool, we did our testing with materials sourced from Worktop Express.

Material variability

The variability between stock materials will be: High. 

Therefore recommendations in this article may need adjustment, depending on your stock.

(High variability is expected when cutting natural materials, and recommendations in this article will likely need more adjustment. Low variability is expected in processed materials, and recommendations in this article will likely need less adjustment.)

Cutter selection

Cutter performance matrix

Use the ‘cutter performance matrix’ below to choose the right type of cutter for your job. 

Performance

Cutter type

Single flute upcut 

Single flute downcut 

Single Flute compression 

Two Flute compression  

Two Flute Straight 

Source of cutter used in test

Rennie Tool 

Rennie Tool

Rennie Tool

Rennie Tool

Rennie Tool

Top surface finish

2

3

1

2

2

Bottom surface finish

3

2

3

3

2

Productivity

3

3

2

2

3

Ease of use

2

2

2

2

3

First pass accuracy

3

1

3

3

2

 

1 = worst, 3 = best

Cutting strategy recommendations

After you have selected your cutter from the ‘Cutter performance matrix’ in the previous section, use this section to define the best cutting strategy in your job file. 

Strategy matrix

To learn about the different strategy parameters, please click on the headings.

 

 

Note: The data presented in this article is from our own testing at Yeti Tool HQ. Our tests were performed using a version 1.3 SmartBench. Here we use a specific supply of materials and cutters (linked). Your supply may be slightly different, therefore take our recommendations as a useful starting point. If at any point you feel that the performance is sub-optimal, please adjust accordingly.

 

 

Before starting a cut, please refer to our knowledgebase article on how to assess and correct your strategy in a real world cut as this documents key strategies used to get the best efficiency and quality out of SmartBench. A test cut is suggested to find feeds and speeds that well suit your machine as variability may occur across different setups. 

Metric data

Cutter Diameter

Plunge rate (mm/min)

Feed rate range* (mm/min)

Spindle speed (RPM)

Max Stepover (mm)

Max Stepdown (mm)

Preferred Direction

Single flute upcut 

3mm

500

2000-4000

23000

1.5

6

Climb

6mm

500

1500-3000

22000

3

3

Climb

8mm

500

1750-3500

22000

4

4

Climb

Single flute downcut 

3mm

500

2000-4000

22000

1.5

6

Conventional

6mm

500

1100-2200

22000

3

3

Conventional

8mm

500

1500-3000

20100

4

4

Conventional

Single Flute compression

3mm

500

1500-3000

22000

1.5

6

Conventional

Two flute compression

3mm

500

1100-2200

18200

1.5

6

Conventional

6mm

500

1300-2600

16300

3

4

Conventional

Two Flute Straight 

3mm

500

1500-3000

22000

1.5

3

Both

6mm

500

2500-5000

23000

3

3

Both

8mm

500

2000-4000

23000

4

4

Both

*We recommend starting at the lowest number in the feed rate range, and adjusting accordingly.

Imperial data

Cutter Diameter

Plunge rate (in/min)

Feed rate range* (in/min)

Spindle speed (RPM)

Max Stepover (in)

Max Stepdown (in)

Preferred Direction

Single flute upcut 

0.125

20

80-160

23000

0.063

0.25

Climb

0.25

20

60-120

22000

0.125

0.125

Climb

0.315

20

69-138

22000

0.16

0.16

Climb 

Single flute downcut 

0.125

20

80-160

22000

0.063

0.25

Conventional

0.25

20

45-90

22000

0.125

0.125

Conventional

0.315

20

59-118

20100

0.16

0.16

Conventional 

Single Flute compression 

0.125

20

60-120

22000

0.063

0.25

Conventional

Two flute compression

0.125

20

45-90

18200

0.063

0.25

Conventional

0.25

20

50-100

16300

0.125

0.16

Conventional

Two Flute Straight 

0.125

20

60-120

22000

0.063

0.125

Both

0.25

20

100-200

23000

0.125

0.125

Both

0.315

20

80-160

23000

0.16

0.16

Both

*We recommend starting at the lowest number in the feed rate range, and adjusting accordingly.

Additional strategy requirements

  • Ramps: Required. This is a way of programming your job file to gradually lower the tool bit into the cutting path, rather than plunging directly down into the material.

  • Leads: Required to reduce burn marks along the surface of your material when using multiple passes, and avoid repeated rising and lowering of the spinning cutter in the same location.

  • Finishing passes: Required for accuracy and finish.

Live adjustment

Selecting the right cutter and strategy will prove to be a useful starting point, but there will be variations between setups that may mean the result is sub-optimal.

The most effective way to correct for these variations is to adjust the feeds and speed as the job happens. These can be tuned using the realtime controls on SmartBench. Alternatively, if you have SmartBench PrecisionPro + or Precision X, you can enable YetiPilot for adaptive feed-rate control.

Workholding

When testing our materials, we use various workholding methods.

For this testing we chose to secure our stock using screws as an easy method of workholding. You need to ensure that your fixtures are placed away from the toolpath so that they are not hit by the cutter when running your job. For more information on general workholding, see our articles here.

Best practice for maintaining accuracy

After the tooling and strategy selection, it is essential to run a machine that is correctly set up. See our article on best practices for accurate cutting.

Final note

We hope this helps you with your project!

Please note that tools listed here are recommendations of solutions which we have found to perform well, but this list is by no means exhaustive. If you have a better experience with a tool not listed here, please submit a support ticket here.

 

 | List | Next >

 

If this article didn't solve your problem, please submit a support ticket here

Kyron Morris

Kyron Morris is the author of this solution

Glad we could be helpful. Thanks for the feedback.

Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Your feedback will help us improve this article.

Did you find it helpful?

Yes   No
Updated on Mon, 22 Apr 2024